Kit Lens vs 35mm Prime Sharpness Test | YOUR THEMES | Photo Forum

Welcome to a new Easy Exposure Photo Forum! I hope you will enjoy new features. It is still work in progress, so please be patients. Thanks!


Avatar

Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Kit Lens vs 35mm Prime Sharpness Test
Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
May 17, 2013
6:20 pm
Avatar
Member
Members

VIP Student
Forum Posts: 1594
Member Since:
December 2, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Mandrake – By the way – not my bike.

Here are two shots absolutely right out of the camera 

with no enhancement or additional sharpening.

The top shot was taken @ 35mm with the 18-55mm lens

and the bottom was taken using my 35mm prime lens.

I can’t tell the difference but maybe others can – let me know.

Thanks…Dale.DSC_5419.jpgDSC_5421.jpg

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
May 18, 2013
4:40 am
Avatar
Long Island, New York
Member
Members

VIP Student
Forum Posts: 2719
Member Since:
September 15, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Dale… You’re right.  I see no discernible (is that redundant?) difference in sharpness.

Kind of makes you wonder, I know.

The 35mm shot does seem a bit brighter.  Maybe the lighting changed.

 

Guess I’ll have to conduct my own extensive testing.  (sigh)

-- Mandrake --

May 18, 2013
5:14 am
Avatar
Spartanburg, SC
Member
Members

VIP Student
Forum Posts: 1054
Member Since:
March 23, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hmmm… I think there is a difference… I think the second is much sharper… I can see it in both the words Hamilton Beach and Sugar twin… top edge of the toaster look much clearer as well…

 

Maybe it’s just me :-)

May 18, 2013
5:51 am
Avatar
Long Island, New York
Member
Members

VIP Student
Forum Posts: 2719
Member Since:
September 15, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Michael… For some reason I did not even look at the words “Hamilton Beach”.

You are right.  Without a doubt, the second photo (35mm prime) is much sharper.

Thanks for clearing this up. (pun intended)

-- Mandrake --

May 18, 2013
9:05 am
Avatar
Member
Members

VIP Student
Forum Posts: 1594
Member Since:
December 2, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thank you both for your input. As I take another look I 

can see that you are both absolutely right! The 35mm is

both sharper and brighter (slightly). I probably should have

picked a better “scene” to conduct the test and if I do another

one I will take great care to be as exact as possible and choose

a subject that will reveal a clear winner.

Dale.    

Still think the 18-55 did a good job but the 35mm won this round lol!

May 18, 2013
9:11 am
Avatar
Long Island, New York
Member
Members

VIP Student
Forum Posts: 2719
Member Since:
September 15, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

nikonguy said
   Still think the 18-55 did a good job but the 35mm won this round lol!

I would hope so.  Otherwise, why buy the prime?

Yes…. I know… it’s fast.  But it’s supposed to be faster and sharper.

-- Mandrake --

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 395

Currently Online:
36 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Mandrake: 2719

nikonguy: 1594

mscharff: 1054

Muneer: 812

Silky: 554

intekhab0731: 553

sameerfulari: 466

Brian Copeland: 449

ergig: 307

Bjørn (Madman): 278

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 9

Members: 2658

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 14

Forums: 87

Topics: 2765

Posts: 15392

Administrators: easyexposure: 2164

Comments are closed.