Macro question | Macro Photos | Photo Forum

Welcome to a new Easy Exposure Photo Forum! I hope you will enjoy new features. It is still work in progress, so please be patients. Thanks!


Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register sp_MemberList Members

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Macro question
January 17, 2013
11:46 am
Avatar
Montreal, Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 88
Member Since:
January 9, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It might sound like a stupid question but there’s something puzzling me for a while..
Having used point and shoots all my life using the same camera for any situations, all my previous cameras had a macro button(flower) wich permits to get very close to an object to snap it.. Since i have my dslr and no macro lens, I can be at about a feet of the object and zoom in until i get approximately the same result..

Now my real question is how will the picture be different from a real macro lens, compared to my regular lens zoomed in?
As an example, how will this picture be different or better if it had been taken with a macro lens?

1-IMG_1258.jpg

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
January 17, 2013
1:33 pm
Avatar
Long Island, New York
Member
Members

VIP Student
Forum Posts: 2719
Member Since:
September 15, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I’ve never used a macro either, Eric so I’m also waiting to hear.
I would guess that with a macro you can focus at a much shorter distance.

Mandrake

-- Mandrake --

January 17, 2013
1:55 pm
Avatar
Montreal, Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 88
Member Since:
January 9, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Mandrake said

I’ve never used a macro either, Eric so I’m also waiting to hear.
I would guess that with a macro you can focus at a much shorter distance.

Mandrake

Me too, but what does a macro give as a gain compared to zooming in.. there has to be something, some macro lens are sooo expensive..

January 17, 2013
2:09 pm
Avatar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 278
Member Since:
August 10, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Well.. One thing is that on a macro you can zoom and come very close to the object after the foto is taken, and it will still be a good pic. You can take a pic. with a “normal” lens and zoom in so you get a macro, but it will be a bad one, it will start to show pixels..

January 17, 2013
3:14 pm
Avatar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6
Member Since:
January 16, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The macro lens is going to let you get closer and sharper and just do it better.
but yea its gona cost my nikor 105mm was $984

January 17, 2013
4:26 pm
Avatar
Admin
Forum Posts: 2164
Member Since:
August 11, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

To be honest I was never into macto, but I think it is time to start. I just got 105mm and will be testing it soon. Stay tuned and you’ll see a video about macro from me. And yes, macro lenses are sharper with more details and you can come much clothes to the subject. For example if lens says it is 1:1, it means that things will show up on the camera sensor their life size. Let say something is 10mm. It will be 10mm on the camera sensor.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 208

Currently Online:
54 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Mandrake: 2719

nikonguy: 1594

mscharff: 1054

Muneer: 812

Silky: 554

intekhab0731: 553

sameerfulari: 466

Brian Copeland: 449

ergig: 307

Bjørn (Madman): 278

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 7

Members: 2650

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 14

Forums: 87

Topics: 2785

Posts: 15443

Administrators: easyexposure: 2164

Comments are closed.