Welcome to a new Easy Exposure Photo Forum! I hope you will enjoy new features. It is still work in progress, so please be patients. Thanks!
5:08 am
VIP Student
December 2, 2012
7:00 pm
VIP Student
September 15, 2012
It took me awhile to figure out the red sign in the first photo, but I finally remembered.
“If it isn’t an Eastman, it isn’t a Kodak.”
That does go back a few years.
I actually owned the box brownie film camera and the brownie 8mm movie camera
which you had to wind up. It had a big metal key on it’s side.
The Wooly looks mean. I assume it is dead.
Mandrake
-- Mandrake --
7:05 pm
VIP Student
December 2, 2012
Mandrake
Exactly right: If it isn’t Eastman…
The old Mammoth has expired and I remember seeing the same mangy
thing in the museum so many years ago as a kid!
Those old cameras are really something but the lighting in the museum
is so dim that the ISO had to be cranked a little (no flash photography allowed)
They are also featuring 100 of the worlds best photos 2012 – National Geographic
and they are spectacular but ABSOLUTELY NO photographs allowed in that exhibit.
10:41 pm
VIP Student
December 2, 2012
4:17 pm
VIP Student
December 2, 2012
Silky
All kidding aside – I live in Victoria, British Columbia, on Vancouver Island.
Surrounded by water just off the coast with a temperate (for the most part) climate.
Right now we’re in the rainy and windy season so not much to take outdoor pics of.
Looking forward to spring and some sunshine lol.
Dale
Most Users Ever Online: 239
Currently Online:
69 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Mandrake: 2719
nikonguy: 1594
mscharff: 1054
Muneer: 812
Silky: 554
intekhab0731: 553
sameerfulari: 466
Brian Copeland: 449
ergig: 307
Bjørn (Madman): 278
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 7
Members: 2765
Moderators: 0
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 14
Forums: 87
Topics: 2908
Posts: 15556
Newest Members:
ketosuprin, JessicaJohny, Mariszes, quickchargepro, vomjera, flexosamineforte, wmlink2step, robinmacoy, alphavitaavis, johnnydeepAdministrators: easyexposure: 2164