Welcome to a new Easy Exposure Photo Forum! I hope you will enjoy new features. It is still work in progress, so please be patients. Thanks!



















12:24 pm
September 7, 2012

Hi Oksana, still on this interesting discussion about reducing the ISO. I came across a tutorial where someone mentioned a classic rule about ISO. It goes as follows:
Good ISOs: 160, 320, 640, 1250, and 2500
Avoid using: 125, 250, 500, and 1000.
What do you say to that please? It appears confusing to me because from my understanding, the higher you go the grainier the picture but the more sensitive to light the camera becomes and hence the exposure is increased. There shouldn’t be any classification of the ‘good’ and ‘bad’ ISO values. I need clarification. Here is the link to the page.
http://tinyurl.com/cl92pkx
Most Users Ever Online: 451
Currently Online:
22 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Mandrake: 2719
nikonguy: 1594
mscharff: 1054
Muneer: 812
Silky: 554
intekhab0731: 553
sameerfulari: 466
Brian Copeland: 449
ergig: 307
Bjørn (Madman): 278
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 9
Members: 2557
Moderators: 0
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 14
Forums: 87
Topics: 2764
Posts: 15326
Newest Members:
Rollinsparry, maryamsmarthasAdministrators: easyexposure: 2164