Welcome to a new Easy Exposure Photo Forum! I hope you will enjoy new features. It is still work in progress, so please be patients. Thanks!
4:27 pm
VIP Student
December 2, 2012
5:24 pm
January 9, 2013
6:23 pm
VIP Student
December 2, 2012
9:07 pm
VIP Student
September 15, 2012
6:00 am
VIP Student
December 2, 2012
Mandrake
The little blue guy was only about an inch long
and very active. No tripod used on these shots.
I got a Manfrotto 290 ball head. $179 + tax, so that
was a pretty good deal. It’s really easy to use and
quite light so I know I’m going to get a lot of
use out of it. I didn’t go for the 3 way ball head (got the
2 way for now) as it saved some $$$. Easy upgrade to the
3 way later if I decide to do that. May not though because the
2 way is really flexible and probably all I’ll need for quite a while.
I trust the guys at the camera store and they suggested the Manfrotto
as a great tripod to start with and one that should last quite a while (hopefully).
Good luck if you get a new one!
6:49 am
VIP Student
September 15, 2012
Dale… Thanks for the information. I’ll check it out.
For a fun test, now that you have the pod…. try this.
With the tripod try manual focusing in live view at full magnification and no VR.
If at maximum focal length on a zoom back off just a hair and shoot at your aperture sweet spot. (I like anywhere between f/8 and f/11.)
Use a cable release or the 2 second timer.
Manual mode works best for all of this… at least for me. It’s very easy to bracket exposure with shutter speed adjustments.
You will love the sharpness.
Oksana…. This spacing really, really is annoying. Out with the new, in with the old!
-- Mandrake --
7:21 am
VIP Student
December 2, 2012
Mandrake
Took note of your test and will try it out and check
back with you re: results. Probably do the test tomorrow.
Oksana – agree with Mandrake – please go back to single space!
Back to the tripod issue – I think you can probably save some $$$
by ordering online or checking out sales. You guys in the U.S.A. generally
get better deals than we do up here in Canada and it’s something we
have grown to accept (not your fault…it’s ours!)
Anyways – I have a lot to do today so I’m outa here and will let you know
how the test turns out.
Dale.
12:10 pm
October 9, 2012
I like’em all Dale and…..
Were these taken in the evening or is it the bushes and trees blocking the light?
Bcz the lighting in the first shot is good but as i go through the coming shots after that..
I feel like a little more light would make them perfect (just my personal opinion and sorry if i m wrong)
7:56 am
VIP Student
December 2, 2012
Sam
Glad you liked the pics!
The frogs are actually housed in a fairly small wood and
glass enclosure. I’ll see if I can find a picture of it and will
post it if I do. The light is good and bad – depending on where
the creatures are at the time. Only lighting is from the sun and
weather conditions play a part in the brightness too.
If I can find that pic of the enclosure I’ll post it and call it “reptile
enclosure” or something like that.
Dale.
Most Users Ever Online: 239
Currently Online:
38 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Mandrake: 2719
nikonguy: 1594
mscharff: 1054
Muneer: 812
Silky: 554
intekhab0731: 553
sameerfulari: 466
Brian Copeland: 449
ergig: 307
Bjørn (Madman): 278
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 7
Members: 2765
Moderators: 0
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 14
Forums: 87
Topics: 2908
Posts: 15556
Newest Members:
ketosuprin, JessicaJohny, Mariszes, quickchargepro, vomjera, flexosamineforte, wmlink2step, robinmacoy, alphavitaavis, johnnydeepAdministrators: easyexposure: 2164