Small Colourful Creatures | Nature and Wildlife photos | Photo Forum

Welcome to a new Easy Exposure Photo Forum! I hope you will enjoy new features. It is still work in progress, so please be patients. Thanks!


Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register sp_MemberList Members

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Small Colourful Creatures
May 11, 2013
4:27 pm
Avatar
Member
Members

VIP Student
Forum Posts: 1594
Member Since:
December 2, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Renewed my season pass to Butterfly Gardens again.

Here are some small toxic frogs and a non toxic butterfly.DSC_4526.jpgDSC_4498.jpgDSC_4510.jpgDSC_4514.jpgDSC_4512.jpgDSC_4469-2.jpgDSC_4648-2.jpg

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
May 11, 2013
5:24 pm
Avatar
Montreal, Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 88
Member Since:
January 9, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Really amazing, i like em all.. Nice bold colors

 

 

May 11, 2013
6:23 pm
Avatar
Member
Members

VIP Student
Forum Posts: 1594
Member Since:
December 2, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Eric

Thanks – glad you liked the pics.

I’m going to see about calibrating my lenses

now that I have a tripod. Will be watching the

video put out by Oksana re: front/back focus to

see if any adjustments are necessary. 

May 11, 2013
9:07 pm
Avatar
Long Island, New York
Member
Members

VIP Student
Forum Posts: 2719
Member Since:
September 15, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I like the little blue guy.  Did you take him home?

 

What was you choice with the tripod and did you get ball or pan head?

I’m still thinking about a new one.

-- Mandrake --

May 12, 2013
6:00 am
Avatar
Member
Members

VIP Student
Forum Posts: 1594
Member Since:
December 2, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Mandrake

The little blue guy was only about an inch long

and very active. No tripod used on these shots.

I got a Manfrotto 290 ball head. $179 + tax, so that

was a pretty good deal. It’s really easy to use and

quite light so I know I’m going to get a lot of 

use out of it. I didn’t go for the 3 way ball head (got the

2 way for now) as it saved some $$$. Easy upgrade to the

3 way later if I decide to do that. May not though because the

2 way is really flexible and probably all I’ll need for quite a while.

I trust the guys at the camera store and they suggested the Manfrotto

as a great tripod to start with and one that should last quite a while (hopefully).

Good luck if you get a new one!

May 12, 2013
6:49 am
Avatar
Long Island, New York
Member
Members

VIP Student
Forum Posts: 2719
Member Since:
September 15, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Dale…  Thanks for the information.  I’ll check it out.

For a fun test, now that you have the pod…. try this.

With the tripod try manual focusing in live view at full magnification and no VR.

If at maximum focal length on a zoom back off just a hair and shoot at your aperture sweet spot.  (I like anywhere between f/8 and f/11.)

Use a cable release or the 2 second timer.

Manual mode works best for all of this… at least for me.  It’s very easy to bracket exposure with shutter speed adjustments.

You will love the sharpness.

 

Oksana…. This spacing really, really is annoying. Out with the new, in with the old!

 

 

-- Mandrake --

May 12, 2013
7:21 am
Avatar
Member
Members

VIP Student
Forum Posts: 1594
Member Since:
December 2, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Mandrake

Took note of your test and will try it out and check

back with you re: results. Probably do the test tomorrow.

Oksana – agree with Mandrake – please go back to single space!

Back to the tripod issue – I think you can probably save some $$$

by ordering online or checking out sales. You guys in the U.S.A. generally

get better deals than we do up here in Canada and it’s something we

have grown to accept (not your fault…it’s ours!)

Anyways – I have a lot to do today so I’m outa here and will let you know

how the test turns out.

Dale.

May 12, 2013
12:10 pm
Avatar
Delft (Netherlands)
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 466
Member Since:
October 9, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I like’em all Dale and…..

Were these taken in the evening or is it the bushes and trees blocking the light?

Bcz the lighting in the first shot is good but as i go through the coming shots after that..

I feel like a little more light would make them perfect (just my personal opinion and sorry if i m wrong)

Smile

May 13, 2013
7:56 am
Avatar
Member
Members

VIP Student
Forum Posts: 1594
Member Since:
December 2, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Sam

Glad you liked the pics!

The frogs are actually housed in a fairly small wood and

glass enclosure. I’ll see if I can find a picture of it and will

post it if I do. The light is good and bad – depending on where

the creatures are at the time. Only lighting is from the sun and

weather conditions play a part in the brightness too.

If I can find that pic of the enclosure I’ll post it and call it “reptile

enclosure” or something like that.Smile

Dale.

 

 

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 239

Currently Online:
38 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Mandrake: 2719

nikonguy: 1594

mscharff: 1054

Muneer: 812

Silky: 554

intekhab0731: 553

sameerfulari: 466

Brian Copeland: 449

ergig: 307

Bjørn (Madman): 278

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 7

Members: 2765

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 14

Forums: 87

Topics: 2908

Posts: 15556

Administrators: easyexposure: 2164

Comments are closed.