Welcome to a new Easy Exposure Photo Forum! I hope you will enjoy new features. It is still work in progress, so please be patients. Thanks!
Log In
Register
Members
Home
Topic RSS
1:42 pm
May 19, 2013
Offline
I know it’s a long time ago, but here I am again. I took a few pictures with my Nikon D5200 with my Nikon 85mm macro lens.
Picture 0001 = 1/30sec. * f = 25 * ISO 6400 * Nikon 85mm macro
Picture 0002 = 1/125sec. * f= 25 * ISO 6400 * Nikon 85mm macro
Picture 0003 = 1/30sec. = f=32 * ISO 12800 * Nikon 85mm macro
5:35 am
VIP Student
September 15, 2012
Offline
Hello Mick. It’s nice to have you back.
I’m a bit confused about why it was necessary to use such small apertures requiring these high ISOs.
And….. In the first and last images… Are these, animal, vegetable, or mineral. (An old 20 questions thing.)
And….. What IS going on in the third image???
Would love to see what the lens is capable of at much closer distances.
-- Mandrake --
8:18 am
VIP Student
April 5, 2013
Offline
Love the snail…a before picture for escargots
10:09 am
May 19, 2013
Offline
Mandrake said
Hello Mick. It’s nice to have you back.
I’m a bit confused about why it was necessary to use such small apertures requiring these high ISOs.
And….. In the first and last images… Are these, animal, vegetable, or mineral. (An old 20 questions thing.)
And….. What IS going on in the third image???Would love to see what the lens is capable of at much closer distances.
Why the high ISO setting and the small apertures? A number of reasons. The lighting conditions were not ideal (high ISO value), I wanted a slightly higher shutter speed, because the pictures were taken at a very short distance (high ISO value) and out of hand. The position in which I made the photos was not very stable, the pictures are taken out of hand, and I wanted to enlarge the DOF by increasing the ISO setting to choose a smaller diafragma and work with a higher shutter speed. I hope I make my clear.
Mandrake said
Hello Mick. It’s nice to have you back.
I’m a bit confused about why it was necessary to use such small apertures requiring these high ISOs.
And….. In the first and last images… Are these, animal, vegetable, or mineral. (An old 20 questions thing.)
And….. What IS going on in the third image???Would love to see what the lens is capable of at much closer distances.
In the macro world depth of field is only an inch at even f 16. so smaller apertures are very common. Mick has managed to get the subject sharp from front to back and that’s because of the apertures he used. Most of my normal lenses don’t even have these f-stops
Rama
Most Users Ever Online: 244
Currently Online:
23 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Mandrake: 2719
nikonguy: 1594
mscharff: 1054
Muneer: 812
Silky: 554
intekhab0731: 553
sameerfulari: 466
Brian Copeland: 449
ergig: 307
Bjørn (Madman): 278
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 7
Members: 2809
Moderators: 0
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 14
Forums: 87
Topics: 2972
Posts: 15621
Newest Members:
leancaps, Junemiller, SupernovaOpulence, voltexheatedvest, NutrWellnessHub, bestheatedvest, manhoodplusgummies, lumilean, nexagenmereviews, payalmehta987Administrators: easyexposure: 2164
