Variable Neutral Denisty Filter | Beyond The Basics | Photo Forum

Welcome to a new Easy Exposure Photo Forum! I hope you will enjoy new features. It is still work in progress, so please be patients. Thanks!


Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register sp_MemberList Members

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Variable Neutral Denisty Filter
Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
September 26, 2015
12:28 pm
Avatar
Daytona Beach, Florida, USA
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 259
Member Since:
September 12, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Neutral-two...no-filter.jpgNeutral-one.jpgI noticed recently that when enlarged to 100 per cent, the quality of my images are very degradated and soft with it. I thought, maybe it’s just that filter, so i purchased another one and got it in mail today, tried it…same thing.  I tried manual focusing, auto, different filter strength, different apertures..same thing. Can’t be the camera. I have a mark ii. And it works fine in every aspect without THAT filter.

I wonder if anyone has seen this also. I did read a few articles that kind of suggest that is something that just has to be a comprimise when using one. I’d like to use it often because i use flash outdoors and by just turning the filter, i can keep my shutter speed below the 1/200 mark always, while maintaining a low aperture. I don’t like using high sync instead. I suppose i might just have to put up with it and try to sharpen as much as possible.

October 12, 2015
3:55 pm
Avatar
Admin
Forum Posts: 2164
Member Since:
August 11, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Yes, filters can degrade the quality of the image, especially on their darker end. Which trends of the filters did you try?

October 13, 2015
4:50 am
Avatar
Daytona Beach, Florida, USA
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 259
Member Since:
September 12, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I returned the filter. That’s the second one I returned. i thought I’d try to see if it was just THAT filter, but the new one did it too, so i returned it too. I forgot the brand. Not expensive  though. So, i just bought a 6 stop fixed N.D.Filter. Worked much better, but too dark…so……i returned that too. And bought a 3 stop fixed. That’s the one i need. I’m using it for outdoor flash to keep my flash below the high sync speed, and to use low apertures. So anyone out there who wants a VARIABLE n.d. filter..read this.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 208

Currently Online:
15 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Mandrake: 2719

nikonguy: 1594

mscharff: 1054

Muneer: 812

Silky: 554

intekhab0731: 553

sameerfulari: 466

Brian Copeland: 449

ergig: 307

Bjørn (Madman): 278

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 7

Members: 2650

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 14

Forums: 87

Topics: 2785

Posts: 15443

Administrators: easyexposure: 2164

Comments are closed.