<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Easy Exposure - Topic: Nikon D7000 vs Nikon D300</title>
	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Everything About Photography]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.7.5.3</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>nikonguy on Nikon D7000 vs Nikon D300</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p10563</link>
        	<category>Nikon Cameras</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p10563</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I have the d7000 and d7100. Very little difference in the two. The d7000 took<br />
fantastic pictures (until the shutter broke unfortunately) The d7100 also takes<br />
wonderful pictures with a LITTLE extra resolution if you look closely. If I had to<br />
pick one I would pick the d7100 as it is nearly 3 years newer with a few additional<br />
bells and whistles BUT if I bought another d7000 I guarantee you I would be a happy<br />
photographer. It just takes wonderful pictures and the difference between 16 and 24<br />
mp's is very small.<br />
The d300 is a dinosaur now and should not be considered in the same league as the newer<br />
cameras.<br />
Dale</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:05:49 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>easyexposure on Nikon D7000 vs Nikon D300</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p10406</link>
        	<category>Nikon Cameras</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p10406</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I personally buy most of the equipment from the local store, with who I have a friendly relationships for a long time already. </p>
<p>But I know a lot of people who use B&#38;H photo video online and are happy with them. </p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:01:27 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>mscharff on Nikon D7000 vs Nikon D300</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p10389</link>
        	<category>Nikon Cameras</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p10389</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you on online purchases... I can tell you I've used B&#38;H photo online and have not had any issues with purchases or returns... if you don't like it, they take it back.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>Michael</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 05:01:25 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Mandrake on Nikon D7000 vs Nikon D300</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p10388</link>
        	<category>Nikon Cameras</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p10388</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Jennings... I don't blame you.  I was not suggesting this particular retailer and, in fact have removed the link to it's site.  I was just thinking that the cost of a D7100 might not be out of your price range, especially if you held off the purchase of a second lens.</p>
<p>(Edited 1/20/14)</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 16:15:21 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>jlambert on Nikon D7000 vs Nikon D300</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p10387</link>
        	<category>Nikon Cameras</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p10387</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Ron &#38; Oksana, I will look into your suggestions.  I tend to be cautious with my online purchasing hearing so many negative stories. I appreciate your feedback.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 15:48:26 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>easyexposure on Nikon D7000 vs Nikon D300</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p10386</link>
        	<category>Nikon Cameras</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p10386</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Nikon D7000 is a great camera. I have it and am happy with it. The only issue I had was back focusing. I have a video about that:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANDZmUnecCw" target="_blank">Lesson18 - AF Fine Tuning (Back Focus and Front Focus)</a>.</p>
<p>But if you can, I would go with newer D7100.<br />
 Tamron 18-270 mm should be enough to start with.<br />
 You can easily get away without 10-24 mm unless you are like indoor architecture photographer. Buy one lens first, start shooting and you might need something totally different. </p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:22:28 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Mandrake on Nikon D7000 vs Nikon D300</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p10385</link>
        	<category>Nikon Cameras</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p10385</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Jennings... It is possible that you can buy the D7100 for less than $200 more.<br />
 I'd go with that with the Tamron 18-270 <strong>only</strong> for now.  It's a good "walk around lens"<br />
 and the 10-24 could wait until you decided that you really need it.</p>
<p>(Edited 1/20/14)</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 12:36:12 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>jlambert on Nikon D7000 vs Nikon D300</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p10384</link>
        	<category>Nikon Cameras</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p10384</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I am looking to purchase a D7000: great price point at $699 body only but my budget for lenses is somewhat restricted.  I like to shoot primarily landscapes, buildings, places and people that pique my interest. My skill level: novice.  I would like to spend less than a $1000 on lenses. Considering Tamron 18-270 and Tamron 10-24 this should cover most of my needs at around $900.  Nikkor lenses would cost about $1700 for near the same focal lengths.  Would I be better off to buy one of the higher quality lenses now and wait to buy the other or at the novice level could I appreciate the difference.  Anyone have recommendations or warnings?</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 12:03:36 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>shriteju81 on Nikon D7000 vs Nikon D300</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p832</link>
        	<category>Nikon Cameras</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p832</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Even I like to go for D7000.. im studying from last 2 months on this one and simultaneously D5100 but more advantage i found D7000 is the best per my statistics.. Thank you.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 02:42:49 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Bjørn (Madman) on Nikon D7000 vs Nikon D300</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p655</link>
        	<category>Nikon Cameras</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p655</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Ok... i have desided to go for D7000. Thx.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 08:58:47 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>easyexposure on Nikon D7000 vs Nikon D300</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p647</link>
        	<category>Nikon Cameras</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p647</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I agree with danielaportela, I would go with D7000. Better image quality, video capability, better ISO performance, higher true resolution, more storage slots (2). It wins in almost everything and it also cheaper.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 06:05:19 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Bjørn (Madman) on Nikon D7000 vs Nikon D300</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p640</link>
        	<category>Nikon Cameras</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p640</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Thx.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 07:54:34 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>daniela on Nikon D7000 vs Nikon D300</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p637</link>
        	<category>Nikon Cameras</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p637</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello. Maybe this video can help. <iframe title="Nikon D7000 vs Nikon D300s Review and Comparison: Why I Recommend the D7000 Over the D300s" width="1200" height="675" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/t-YJdr6eVAI?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
 I personally prefer the D7000 because I don't need the 51 points of focusing neither the 8 frames per second, because I don't shoot too many fast sport scenes. D7000 could also perform 8 frames per second if you use it with a grip. D7000 is better in ISO performances, have 2 slots for SD cards and has 4 Megapixels extra than D300s.  See some compared features for detail: <a href="http://snapsort.com/compare/Nikon_D300-vs-Nikon_D7000" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><a href="http://snapsort.com/compare/Ni" rel="nofollow">http://snapsort.com/compare/Ni</a>.....ikon_D7000</a></p>
<p>I don't know the differences btw D300 and D300s.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:59:56 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Bjørn (Madman) on Nikon D7000 vs Nikon D300</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p636</link>
        	<category>Nikon Cameras</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nikon-cameras/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300/#p636</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>witch camera is the best choice?</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:21:44 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>