<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Easy Exposure - Topic: What shall I need to do?</title>
	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nature-and-wildlife-photos/what-shall-i-need-to-do/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Everything About Photography]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.7.5.3</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nature-and-wildlife-photos/what-shall-i-need-to-do/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>Mandrake on What shall I need to do?</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nature-and-wildlife-photos/what-shall-i-need-to-do/#p3022</link>
        	<category>Nature and Wildlife photos</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nature-and-wildlife-photos/what-shall-i-need-to-do/#p3022</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Silky... I'm not really sure you mean "depth of field".<br />
Is this more of what you are looking for?<br />
Post processing with lightroom 4 and pse 10.</p>
<p>Mandrake<br />
<img src="http://easy-exposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/26gqp-silky-lake.jpg" width="675" alt="http://easy-exposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/26gqp-silky-lake.jpg" /></p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:16:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>nikonguy on What shall I need to do?</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nature-and-wildlife-photos/what-shall-i-need-to-do/#p3008</link>
        	<category>Nature and Wildlife photos</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/nature-and-wildlife-photos/what-shall-i-need-to-do/#p3008</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Silky<br />
Have you watched Oksana's latest youtube video?<br />
She talks about depth of field and that might help you with your<br />
question.<br />
I see that you used f16 which does allow for a great depth of field<br />
but where was your main focus point? If you focused on the shoreline<br />
that is where you are going to get the most "in focus" area.<br />
Just my thought about it - good luck...Dale</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:37:31 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>