Easy Exposure - Topic: new sarah pics

intekhab0731 on new sarah pics

Tue, 13 Nov 2012 06:44:46 -0800

yep!! Mandrake.... its the same bick.... of that hdr pic.....

easyexposure on new sarah pics

Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:34:15 -0800

Good points Vitfoto and Mandrake! I am moving these photos to Family and Kids section.

Mandrake on new sarah pics

Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:01:09 -0800

I think that's my motorbike in the first photo.
Mandrake.

intekhab0731 on new sarah pics

Mon, 12 Nov 2012 06:18:52 -0800

thanks vitfoto... i will ..... try to fix that.......

vitfoto on new sarah pics

Sun, 11 Nov 2012 06:35:26 -0800

I actually agree with Mandrake, if you use a few tools in photoshop it doesn't mean the photo is manipulated it simply edited in photoshop or other photo processing application. In fact if you shoot jpeg your cameras software does some editing like contrast, vibrance, sharpening and such. I bet every photo that people post to this forum is edited but only a few are manipulated in the way that it simply was impossible to capture in camera so it involved a complicated process of blending multiple plates that where shot separately sometimes in the different locations, some things might even been created manually in photoshop. I have thousands of photos that i captured, but only about 10 consider manipulated the rest are simply edited. I am sorry for being strait forward with my comment, I didn't mean to offend any one.

I like the second photo better it is well composed, the subject looks more relaxed, and i like horizontal crop better but thats just personal taste. The first photos background is a bit busy also the facial expression of the subject sims like she was in the middle of saying something and look a bit tense. The hair is a bit messy over the eyes in both portraits which could be removed in photoshop, but I always try to pay attention to this when shooting so I don't have to do it. When shooting portraits I use single focus point set to one of the eyes, both of the photos look a bit soft, try using some photoshop tools to fix that.

Mandrake on new sarah pics

Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:18:26 -0800

Thanks, intekhab. I was just trying to find where you altered the photo with photoshop. I surely didn't mean to upset anyone.
Mandrake.

intekhab0731 on new sarah pics

Sat, 10 Nov 2012 12:46:30 -0800

the point . i used some tools of Photoshop on the pics.... that`s why? and as Deensani say`s Easy-exposure police.....LOL

deensani on new sarah pics

Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:15:55 -0800

Mandrake: Easy-exposure police.lol
Just kidding

Mandrake on new sarah pics

Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:53:21 -0800

Is there a reason you decided to put these in "Photoshop Manipulations" rather that "Family and Kids"? Am I missing something?
Mandrake.

deensani on new sarah pics

Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:26:03 -0800

I don't know why but I prefer the 2nd photo 'cos is a great shot. The first one looks a bit soft and busy with the motorbike.

intekhab0731 on new sarah pics

Fri, 09 Nov 2012 17:53:00 -0800

check out and please do comment...... it really helps.....