<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Easy Exposure - Topic: Variable Neutral Denisty Filter</title>
	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/variable-neutral-denisty-filter/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Everything About Photography]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.7.5.3</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/variable-neutral-denisty-filter/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>patindaytona on Variable Neutral Denisty Filter</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/variable-neutral-denisty-filter/#p14950</link>
        	<category>Beyond The Basics</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/variable-neutral-denisty-filter/#p14950</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I returned the filter. That's the second one I returned. i thought I'd try to see if it was just THAT filter, but the new one did it too, so i returned it too. I forgot the brand. Not expensive  though. So, i just bought a 6 stop fixed N.D.Filter. Worked much better, but too dark...so......i returned that too. And bought a 3 stop fixed. That's the one i need. I'm using it for outdoor flash to keep my flash below the high sync speed, and to use low apertures. So anyone out there who wants a VARIABLE n.d. filter..read this.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 04:50:05 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>easyexposure on Variable Neutral Denisty Filter</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/variable-neutral-denisty-filter/#p14937</link>
        	<category>Beyond The Basics</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/variable-neutral-denisty-filter/#p14937</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, filters can degrade the quality of the image, especially on their darker end. Which trends of the filters did you try?</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:55:18 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>patindaytona on Variable Neutral Denisty Filter</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/variable-neutral-denisty-filter/#p14915</link>
        	<category>Beyond The Basics</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/variable-neutral-denisty-filter/#p14915</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p><img title="Neutral-two...no-filter.jpg" alt="Neutral-two...no-filter.jpg" src="http://easy-exposure.com/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/patindaytona/2015/09/Neutral-two...no-filter.jpg" width="948" height="660" /><img title="Neutral-one.jpg" alt="Neutral-one.jpg" src="http://easy-exposure.com/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/patindaytona/2015/09/Neutral-one.jpg" width="1007" height="680" />I noticed recently that when enlarged to 100 per cent, the quality of my images are very degradated and soft with it. I thought, maybe it's just that filter, so i purchased another one and got it in mail today, tried it...same thing.  I tried manual focusing, auto, different filter strength, different apertures..same thing. Can't be the camera. I have a mark ii. And it works fine in every aspect without THAT filter.</p>
<p>I wonder if anyone has seen this also. I did read a few articles that kind of suggest that is something that just has to be a comprimise when using one. I'd like to use it often because i use flash outdoors and by just turning the filter, i can keep my shutter speed below the 1/200 mark always, while maintaining a low aperture. I don't like using high sync instead. I suppose i might just have to put up with it and try to sharpen as much as possible.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2015 12:28:27 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>