<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Easy Exposure - Forum: Beyond The Basics</title>
	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Everything About Photography]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.7.5.3</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>patindaytona on Using Large Modifiers Outdoors on Location</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/using-large-modifiers-outdoors-on-location/#p15663</link>
        	<category>Beyond The Basics</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/using-large-modifiers-outdoors-on-location/#p15663</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>By the way..anyone know where i can get a passport?(hahah)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I use a 43" or so umbrella when taking photos on location, but after buying more than one modifier (softbox also), I'm finding it's almost impractical to use most of the time because i don't shoot models. These are freinds, and they want a photo NOW.    It takes time to set it up even just a few minutes. I know my stuff when it comes to using soft light, but they look at me like Awww, you don't need that, just take the photo.     So, even though i bring it, half the time I'm using a bare flash on the stand to save time. But also because alot of time their are alot of "spectators" around, and i don't feel comfortable setting up this stuff in congested public areas.   I have read and watched so many videos how everyone does it, but this is something i don't understand. Maybe most of them, are shooting ONE model with no time restraints and also, in more secluded places.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 07:32:58 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>patindaytona on Correct exposure while using flash.</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/correct-exposure-while-using-flash/#p15278</link>
        	<category>Beyond The Basics</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/correct-exposure-while-using-flash/#p15278</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Nice video Oksana. I've been struggling with off-camera flash for a few years now. I am a chronic note taker and am constantly revising them.</p>
<p>But i think i have it all down pretty good now. The only problem that will never change though is that i use manual off camera flash. I cannont afford or maybe it was that TTL off camera flash wizards weren't compatable with my units.</p>
<p>I understand alot use manual though. I don't use a light meter either. If i did, it would make taking on the spur of moment photos way too long. They are impatient as it is when i have to take more than one photo with flash. I know it'll be somewhere around 1/4 to full power in daylight ballpark figure to start with.</p>
<p>Indoors, i have decided i won't need any off camera flash and i'll just use TTL on camera from now on. I have to be more systematic or it'll quickly become overwhelming again as it has been for so long. I'd like to see a Topic on using flash indoors/out.</p>
<p>And your advice on it.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 10:40:30 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>easyexposure on Correct exposure while using flash.</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/correct-exposure-while-using-flash/#p15027</link>
        	<category>Beyond The Basics</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/correct-exposure-while-using-flash/#p15027</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Marianne! Welcome to the forum. Sorry for late reply. First of all did you watch my video about flash? <br />
Please let me know if it cleared some things out and it you still have any question.</p>
<p><iframe title="Lesson 26 - Using Flash: Exposure and Flash Modes" width="1200" height="675" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/O2WMKGpmqFg?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:35:11 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Marianne333 on Correct exposure while using flash.</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/correct-exposure-while-using-flash/#p14998</link>
        	<category>Beyond The Basics</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/correct-exposure-while-using-flash/#p14998</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello my name is Marianne and I just recently started learning photography on my own. I am really glad I found this forum because it allows me to ask questions. So here is my question. I hope you'll be able to provide an answer for me. So far I was shooting without flash and only now decided to shoot using hot shoe flash. But I don't quite understand how to get the correct exposure when using flash. Are we going to have <strong>two</strong> apertures - one for the <strong>camera</strong> and one for the <strong>flash</strong>, <strong>two</strong> ISO's - one for the <strong>camera</strong> and one for the <strong>flash</strong> and <strong>two</strong> shutter speeds - one for the <strong>camera</strong> and one for the <strong>flash</strong> or are we going to have <strong>just one</strong> aperture, ISO and shutter speed? So how does it work? And how the correct exposure is calculated with different flash modes? So please help me out. Thank you very much, Marianne. </p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:47:32 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>patindaytona on Variable Neutral Denisty Filter</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/variable-neutral-denisty-filter/#p14950</link>
        	<category>Beyond The Basics</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/variable-neutral-denisty-filter/#p14950</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I returned the filter. That's the second one I returned. i thought I'd try to see if it was just THAT filter, but the new one did it too, so i returned it too. I forgot the brand. Not expensive  though. So, i just bought a 6 stop fixed N.D.Filter. Worked much better, but too dark...so......i returned that too. And bought a 3 stop fixed. That's the one i need. I'm using it for outdoor flash to keep my flash below the high sync speed, and to use low apertures. So anyone out there who wants a VARIABLE n.d. filter..read this.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 04:50:05 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>easyexposure on Variable Neutral Denisty Filter</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/variable-neutral-denisty-filter/#p14937</link>
        	<category>Beyond The Basics</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/variable-neutral-denisty-filter/#p14937</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, filters can degrade the quality of the image, especially on their darker end. Which trends of the filters did you try?</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:55:18 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>patindaytona on Variable Neutral Denisty Filter</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/variable-neutral-denisty-filter/#p14915</link>
        	<category>Beyond The Basics</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/variable-neutral-denisty-filter/#p14915</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p><img title="Neutral-two...no-filter.jpg" alt="Neutral-two...no-filter.jpg" src="http://easy-exposure.com/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/patindaytona/2015/09/Neutral-two...no-filter.jpg" width="948" height="660" /><img title="Neutral-one.jpg" alt="Neutral-one.jpg" src="http://easy-exposure.com/wp-content/sp-resources/forum-image-uploads/patindaytona/2015/09/Neutral-one.jpg" width="1007" height="680" />I noticed recently that when enlarged to 100 per cent, the quality of my images are very degradated and soft with it. I thought, maybe it's just that filter, so i purchased another one and got it in mail today, tried it...same thing.  I tried manual focusing, auto, different filter strength, different apertures..same thing. Can't be the camera. I have a mark ii. And it works fine in every aspect without THAT filter.</p>
<p>I wonder if anyone has seen this also. I did read a few articles that kind of suggest that is something that just has to be a comprimise when using one. I'd like to use it often because i use flash outdoors and by just turning the filter, i can keep my shutter speed below the 1/200 mark always, while maintaining a low aperture. I don't like using high sync instead. I suppose i might just have to put up with it and try to sharpen as much as possible.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2015 12:28:27 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Mandrake on printing on wood</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/printing-on-wood/#p14209</link>
        	<category>Beyond The Basics</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/printing-on-wood/#p14209</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Don't think so.<br />
I wouldn't want to waste any good wood.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2015 20:37:46 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>mscharff on printing on wood</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/printing-on-wood/#p14207</link>
        	<category>Beyond The Basics</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/printing-on-wood/#p14207</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>This looked really cool... was wondering if anyone has actually tried this (and if it works) and if it matters what kind of photo paper you use (or if color works as well as B&#38;W.</p>
<p><a href="http://faithtap.com/2466/how-to-create-a-wooden-picture/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><a href="http://faithtap.com/2466/how-t" rel="nofollow">http://faithtap.com/2466/how-t</a>.....n-picture/</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Maybe another video idea for Oksona!   <img src="http://easy-exposure.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":-)" class="spWPSmiley" style="max-height:1em;margin:0"  /> </p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2015 11:52:12 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>easyexposure on DOF Calculator question using FX lens on DX body</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/dof-calculator-question-using-fx-lens-on-dx-body/#p13970</link>
        	<category>Beyond The Basics</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/dof-calculator-question-using-fx-lens-on-dx-body/#p13970</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>You enter the camera model, you use and focal lengths as it is. So for 50mm 1.4D lens, you enter 50mm. It doesn't matter if lens work with FX or no. What matters is the camera you use. </p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 16:55:12 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>deborah.richardson on DOF Calculator question using FX lens on DX body</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/dof-calculator-question-using-fx-lens-on-dx-body/#p13959</link>
        	<category>Beyond The Basics</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/dof-calculator-question-using-fx-lens-on-dx-body/#p13959</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I watched the lesson where you showed the DOF Master app for your phone to calculate DOF.  I bought the app but am unsure which  focal length to enter.  I have the D7000 which is DX and I just purchased the 50mm 1.4D lens, which I believe is FX lens.  Should I enter 50mm or should I enter 75mm since that is what my camera will see?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks for your tutorials.  I am learning a lot.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>debbie richardson</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 15:46:36 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>patindaytona on Flash Ratio</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/flash-ratio/#p13666</link>
        	<category>Beyond The Basics</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/flash-ratio/#p13666</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Ok, this is a very tough question.</p>
<p>When I use a off camera flash coupled with my on-camera flash unit, and set a ratio....say 1:3 for example, does it mean that 1:3 is maintained no matter how close to subject i use the off-camera flash,............or does the ratio change if i don't have both flash units at exactly the same distance from subject. TTL</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 05:14:31 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Rachidk on How To Tell A Story With Your Photographs</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/how-to-tell-a-story-with-your-photographs/#p10476</link>
        	<category>Beyond The Basics</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/how-to-tell-a-story-with-your-photographs/#p10476</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Very good and worth reading. Thank you for sharing.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:07:58 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>mscharff on How To Tell A Story With Your Photographs</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/how-to-tell-a-story-with-your-photographs/#p9721</link>
        	<category>Beyond The Basics</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/how-to-tell-a-story-with-your-photographs/#p9721</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>some good advice.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2013 07:21:16 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Mandrake on How To Tell A Story With Your Photographs</title>
        	<link>http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/how-to-tell-a-story-with-your-photographs/#p9719</link>
        	<category>Beyond The Basics</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://easy-exposure.com/photo-forum/beyond-the-basics/how-to-tell-a-story-with-your-photographs/#p9719</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Here's a link to the article.  It might be easier to read.<br />
<a href="http://www.lightstalking.com/storytelling" target="_blank"><a href="http://www.lightstalking.com/s" rel="nofollow">http://www.lightstalking.com/s</a>.....orytelling</a></p>
<p>&#160;</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2013 06:08:02 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>